🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.